Silas Marner Essays

Silas Marner Essays Silas Marner Essay Silas Marner Essay Essay Topic: Literature The novel Silas Marner is a story of old fashioned village life in a remote place called Raveloe, showing how the community responds to the old weaver, Silas Marner, who was once a respected member of a narrower evangelical congregation. The story, set in Raveloe in 1805, was written by Mary Ann (Marian) Evans under her pen name George Eliot. The tale soon flashes back to events that took place before 1805, to the late 18th century, and reflects times past, even for the readers of George Eliots time. The author uses an omniscient narrator, but her own preaching judgements and summaries can often be seen coming through as can some of William Wordsworths ideas and views on the value of what can be learned from the natural world and the innocence of childhood. This preaching demonstrates many of her own opinions, formed largely through her own experience of the religious outlook of the evangelical churches that sprung up in larger towns and cities and to which she had briefly belonged. William Wordsworth ideas, of the importance of childrens influences on adults rather than the adults influence on children, shine through as we read, for example: . . . for the little child had come to link him once more with the whole world. These words suggest that Eppie has brought Silas back to life (having lost everything at Lantern Yard, when he was framed for stealing and for a second time when his gold was stolen.) She opens him up and introduces him into the community of Raveloe. Her true fathers rejection of her has the opposite effect. He ends up in a childless marriage and only then does he want her back. But he is too late 16 years too late. If Silas story had never intersected with another characters, that of Godfrey Cass, then Godfrey would have carried on living a lie and we would never have been shown the different views of each character about what a fathers duty is, and which is wrong and which is right. It is this crossing of stories that exposes Godfreys dark secret and provides us with obvious similarities of circumstances, though each has a different background, and quite obvious differences of character. The differences of character allow us to examine moral problems in their social context, which is one of Eliots great interests she always wrote with moral purpose. Through her narrative, George Eliot creates a sympathetic background for Silas Marner in the opening two chapters so that we like him more even though he totally excludes himself from the community. Lack of detailed background information for Godfrey has the opposite effect. The setting plays a part in evoking this sympathy Raveloe is an isolated and old-fashioned community where newcomers are not welcome: And Raveloe was a village where many of the old echoes lingered, undrowned by new voices. (Pg. 11.) This suggests that old echoes or old fashioned ways still remain in the village and new people cannot change them. The secluded village also escapes the effects of industrialisation. The country folk are described as mostly not clever and we find out that anyone with a skill in handicraft or anyone who is clever is an object of suspicion because the people of Raveloe are so simple-minded they fear the unknown and dont want to venture into it. Emigrants from other towns were to the last regarded as aliens by their fellow neighbours, as was Silas (even after 15 years of living there.) Silas knowledge of herbs and his suffering of cataleptic fits also adds to the villagers suspicion (being so narrow-minded they couldnt accept anything different to their backward way of life.) Using flashback the author creates sympathy for Marner, providing detail of how he was betrayed by his best friend William Dane who framed him for theft whilst he was in one of his fits. Of course this elicts sympathy as his best friend betrayed him in a community where he was well respected and was of a high status. After the drawing of the lots (which wrongly pointed to his guilt,) he was forced out of his hometown and lost everything his friends, his respect, his status, his home, his faith in God and his fiance (who married William.) This technique tends to make us like Silas more and Godfrey less so that when he ends up in deep regret over Eppie we feel he deserves it. During Silas solitude in Raveloe, his money builds up and Marner drew less and less for his own wants. His money was not there to spend any more, but to be his only companions in the lonely life he now lived. when his work was done, that he drew them out to enjoy their companionship. He didnt want to spend them because they were something to live for more money. His days became repetitive working for more guineas, never to be spent. In relation to this, Marners life is compared to that of an insect meaningless, not cared about by anyone, a nobody. all these immediate promptings helped to reduce his life to the unquesting activity of a spinning insect. The quote also refers to the repetitiveness of his weaving and gives a visualisation of his life being small (insect size.) Eliot, however, decides not to create sympathy like this for Godfrey. She does not describe Godfreys past how he grew up without a mother. This has a different effect on the reader : we dont like him and we dont feel sorry for him either. We also wrongly assume that because he is rich, he has everything he wants and is simply being ungrateful and selfish. This contributes to us feeling that Godfrey deserves the childless marriage he ends up with and that Silas Marner deserves to keep Eppie when Godfrey comes to take her back 16 years after he deserted her. This leaves Godfrey regretting what he has done and leaves Silas never happier, with his daughter, Eppie. The habits of the squirearchy are described as a feverish way of annulling vacancy, which could be compared to Silas Marners weaving because this habit is also repetitive and is also a way of hiding from the emptiness of his lone life. In absence of all Silas used to have (faith, friends, an important position in the community,) Silas moves to an isolated village named Raveloe and retreats to anull vacancy in a way that we can understand. Although there is a parallel between the squirearchys habits (gambling) and Silas weaving, Silas weaving is fair, hard work for money, whereas Godfreys gambling is frowned upon. George Eliot makes us feel sorry for Silas but not Godfrey. She does this through flashing back to Silas background and how he lost everything at Lantern Yard that fateful day. She does not do this for Godfrey though. At first, Godfrey Cass seems to be a good, open man but thanks to the narrator we find out that he does, in fact, have a dark secret he is already a husband and a father. But in chapter 3 Godfrey is said to be the eldest, a fine, open-faced, good natured, young man (Pg. 33.) This isnt true. It is ironic because he certainly isnt open-faced because he already has a secret wife and child he has deserted. In this respect he is even worse than his brother, Dunstan, although in most other ways he is much more respectable. At least he isnt proud of what he does like Dunstan, who takes pride in gambling and dealing. Godfrey does regret and is sorry for the mistakes he has made. He is, however, weak as a person. The villagers like him because he keeps his secret so they dont even know what kind of person he is. They described Dunsey though, as a spiteful, jeering fellow, who seemed to enjoy the drink the more when other people went dry Dunstan got Godfrey into this mess about selling Wildf ire by stealing the  £100.00 in return for his silence. In Godfreys attempt to find  £100 rather than tell people about his marriage, he entrustes his horse Wildfire to Dunstan to sell, however, Dunstan takes the horse and decides to race it before selling it. It jumps badly over a fence and is staked. So Dunstan leaves the horse lying in its blood, and chooses to go by Silas Marners cottage to persuade him to lend the money. When he arrives, the door is open and Silas has gone out. Dunstan, seeing the give away fingerprints in the sand, sweeps it across and opens the trapdoor, beneath which he finds all Silas savings. He takes it and leaves into the fog and darkness. This is the second time that Silas has lost everything but this time it is different because it is the first time Silas seeks help from the village and the people. As the loss of the gold gradually becomes less topical in Raveloe, Christmas approaches. Christmas in the weavers cottage is very different to the Christmas at the Red House. He spends it in loneliness, eating his meat in sadness of heart The evening is described as lifelong and Silas spent it pressing his head between his hands and moaning. He was very unhappy and very lonely. Christmas at the Red House was very different: there was a buzz of voices The people there were much happier and far from alone, like Silas. This contrasts with how unhappy Silas was, even at the happiest time of year, but all this changes when Eppie arrives; Eppie warmed him into joy because she had joy. The annual New Years ball at the Red House was also very well prepared there was hardly a bedroom in the house where feminine compliments werent passing, as ladies from far and wide arrived and made themselves ready for the grand event. The enormous gap between the two lifestyles is shown here. But while the Squire continues to make comments about marriage and roses blooming this winter who else is on her way to the ball? Godfreys wife, and she has his child with her. She is planning to expose him. However, the journey has been long and cold and she craves the last phial of opium she is carrying. Unable to resist her addiction, she swallows it and lies down to rest in the snow, oblivious of the danger. She freezes, so she wasnt able to confront Godfrey in front of Nancy or anyone else. The child in her arms crawls towards the only light visible and enters Silas cottage. At this time Silas had been staring dreamily out of his front door wandering if his money could ever return when his catalepsy took over. He did not notice the little girl go right past him into the warm. When his sensibility returns he continues his action of shutting the door and turned to the hearth. His blurred vision told him that his gold was right there on the floor! He reached forward to feel the familiar hard outline of the gold but instead, he felt soft warm curls. It was a sleeping child. These curls felt better than coins because they were indeed, part of a better treasure. Silas got all the pleasure from bringing Eppie up, Godfrey got all the regret. This was because Silas knew the real duty of a father. Godfrey thought proving materially was enough. This is the moral in this book a fathers duty is more than making sure your child has money. Eppie proves this to us when she rejects the offer to go and live with him just because he could provide better for her. She made this decision to stay with Silas alone, despite his telling her to choose as she wished. Deep down though, Silas was desperate to keep her, he loved her so much. He was the one whod been there for her all of her life. Godfrey only wanted her because he knew now he couldnt have his own child with Nancy. Godfrey and Silas do have similarities; their own ways of nulling vacancy is one, but they also have very important differences: particularly their different ideas of fatherhood. It turns out Silas is right and Godfreys rejection of his child brings him only deep regret, which Eliots creation of sympathy for Silas and not Godfrey, makes us feel he deserved.

Unnecessary commas - Emphasis

Unnecessary commas Unnecessary commas Write Away reader Bill Friar got in touch to air one of his professional writing bugbears: I would dearly love to see an item on the creeping trend of putting commas between peoples names and their titles or descriptive terms. For example: Prime Minister, David Cameron, spoke outside Downing Street. or action star, Tom Cruise, went on a rampage I dont remember seeing this kind of thing very often even five years ago. Now its everywhere. The madness must stop. Thanks, Bill. You make an excellent point those double commas hugging Tom Cruise and David Cameron shouldnt be there. But why is this punctuation wrong? Appositives Its wrong because Tom and David, in the above examples, are restrictive appositives. Say what? An appositive is a word, phrase or clause that renames, explains or identifies another noun in the same sentence. They can be restrictive or nonrestrictive. For example: Emphasis Training, the business-writing trainers, are based in Brighton. Youll notice that the appositive above is tucked away between commas. This is because the business-writing trainers is a nonrestrictive appositive: if you remove it from the sentence youd still know who the subject (Emphasis) is, and it would still make sense. However, some appositives are restrictive they cant be left out of the sentence without changing the meaning or leaving people confused. Restrictive appositives should not have commas round them. In Bills examples, the names cant be removed because it would leave the sentences incomplete, as they dont start with a determiner (eg the, a, our etc): Prime Minister spoke outside Downing Street Action star went on a rampage And even if they did, we might still need more information to properly identify the subjects in question, and not leave the reader guessing. For all we know, Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina was speaking outside Downing Street about Bruce Williss recent rampage. Now thats how rumours get started.